Part One
In
an opinion piece written for Western Journalism by Charles G. Mills, which is
titled From
Calvinism to Islam, the author, a Roman Catholic, takes several
ill-informed and misdirected swipes at Calvinism.
The
foil for Mills’ attack is the recent Bergdahl affair, and it is the latest instance
of what may well turn into a trend, as witness the relatively recent and equally
wild flailing of Dr. Mary Stange, likewise in an opinion piece (USA Today), who
also used the Bergdahl situation to attack Calvinism: Can
Bergdahl’s faith explain his actions? (For those who are interested,
several responses to Dr. Stange can be found in the following articles: A
Response to Professor Mary Stange’s USA Today Article on Bowe Bergdahl, Helping
the media understand Bergdahl and his religious past, USA
Today Slams the Reformed Faith…A Slight Rebuttal.)
According
to Mr. Mills, Bowe Bergdahl and his father “are said by some to have become
Muslims,” a bit of unsubstantiated gossip that Mr. Mills, undoubtedly hastened
by his unwillingness to be bogged down with the pesky business of presenting
evidence, and justified by the opportunity it provided him to lampoon
Calvinism, turned into an established fact in the short space of two sentences.
Nevertheless, as interesting as all that is, it isn’t my intention here to
probe into the truth or falsity of what some people have said about the alleged
conversions of Bob and Bowe Bergdahl. Neither is it my intention to upbraid the
author for all too easily hopping on the rumor mill, an effort that would quite
possibly only cause him to swell with pride that he is living up to the family
name. I’m also not interested here in
going on at any length about how Mills' evident ability to transubstantiate a
rumor into a fact through a bit of verbal legerdemain shows that he missed his
calling as a priest in the Catholic church which, as every self-respecting Catholic
knows, is where the real hocus pocus takes place. Instead, what agitates this
response is the following statement made by Mr. Mills:
Bowe
Bergdahl was home-schooled and raised as a very strict Calvinist. It should not
surprise us that a Calvinist has become a Moslem. The two religions have much
in common.
As
this response to Mills will demonstrate, what he believes about Calvinism and
Islam shows that he knows very little about either, which is perhaps Mills’ way
of living out Rome’s teaching on implicit faith, i.e. belief devoid of personal
knowledge.
As
Mills would have it, Calvinism and Islam have the following four things in
common, and these commonalities make a transition from the former to the latter
both easy and natural:
- “Both have a constricted view of the nature of God, a view that limits human responsibility.”
- “Calvinism and Islam are characterized by unjust and harsh laws.”
- “Both Islam and Calvinism practice an extreme form of textual literalism in understanding scripture.”
- “…both Islam and Calvinism produce self-righteousness and intolerance.”
Each
of these claims will be dealt with in several future installments. For now, the reader
can smart from the fact that it is a Roman Catholic who is leveling the charge
that Calvinism makes it easy to convert to Islam. After all, it was a Pope,
not Calvin, who said to Muslim youth: “We believe in the same God, the one God,
the living God, the God who created the world and brings his creatures to their
perfection,”(*)
a statement every bit in conformity with Vatican II (See Nostra Aetate, Lumen Gentium,
Ch. II, sec. 16, and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, par. 841.). And it
was Calvin, not a Pope, who said:
John’s saying has always been true: “He that
does not have the Son does not have the Father” [1 John 2:23 p.]. For even if
men once boasted that they worshipped the Supreme Majesty, the Maker of heaven
and earth, yet because they had no Mediator it was not possible for them truly
to taste God’s mercy, and thus be persuaded that he was their Father.
Accordingly, because they did not hold Christ as their Head, they possessed
only a fleeting knowledge of God. From this it also came about that they at
last lapsed into crass and foul superstitions and betrayed their own ignorance.
So today the Turks [i.e. Muslims –AR], although they proclaim at the top of
their lungs that the Creator of heaven and earth is God, still, while
repudiating Christ, substitute an idol in place of the true God. [John T.
McNeill, editor, Ford Lewis Battles, trans., Institutes of the Christian Religion (Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press, 1960), Vol. I, II:6:4.]
For part two, go here.
No comments:
Post a Comment